Learn how Databuddy and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 3 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both Databuddy and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics leads in popularity with 2,667 stars vs 1,060 stars for Databuddy. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 486 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Databuddy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 24 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Databuddy is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Databuddy uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Databuddy which began 1 year ago. This 13.1-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Databuddy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OpenWebAnalytics uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Databuddy also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Databuddy and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs