Learn how Bklit and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

OpenWebAnalytics appears to have several advantages over Bklit, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces Bklit in community adoption with 2,662 stars compared to 248 stars on GitHub. This 10.7x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 484 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Bklit shows more recent development activity with its last commit 22 days ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Bklit is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Bklit which began 11 months ago. This 13.3-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Bklit's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Bklit and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs