Learn how Bklit and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 3 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

OpenWebAnalytics appears to have several advantages over Bklit, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics significantly outpaces Bklit in community adoption with 2,667 stars compared to 262 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests OpenWebAnalytics has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 486 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Bklit shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 days ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Bklit is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Bklit which began 1 year ago. This 13.3-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Bklit's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Bklit and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs