Learn how Bklit and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Bklit, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces Bklit in community adoption with 21,570 stars compared to 262 stars on GitHub. This 82.3x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,853 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bklit last updated 10 days ago and Matomo 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses JSX, Next.js while Matomo leverages Vue, PHP.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Bklit which began 1 year ago. This 14.3-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Bklit's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Bklit and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs