Learn how Bklit and HitKeep differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Bklit and HitKeep have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bklit significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 249 stars compared to 51 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Bklit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bklit has 24 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
HitKeep shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Bklit was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests HitKeep is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bklit uses JSX, Next.js while HitKeep leverages SCSS, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bklit beginning 1 year ago and HitKeep 6 months ago.
HitKeep is licensed under MIT, while Bklit's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Bklit and HitKeep offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs