Learn how Litlyx and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 5 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

OpenWebAnalytics appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenWebAnalytics leads in popularity with 2,662 stars vs 1,691 stars for Litlyx. The 57% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 484 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenWebAnalytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 months ago, while Litlyx was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests OpenWebAnalytics is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Litlyx uses Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js while OpenWebAnalytics leverages PHP.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 12.3-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Litlyx is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OpenWebAnalytics uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Litlyx and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs