Learn how Fathom Lite and Litlyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 5 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Fathom Lite appears to have several advantages over Litlyx, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite significantly outpaces Litlyx in community adoption with 8,007 stars compared to 1,691 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 380 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fathom Lite shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 month ago, while Litlyx was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Fathom Lite is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Litlyx's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx extends into Product Analytics.
Litlyx provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs