Learn how Fathom Lite and Swetrix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Fathom Lite and Swetrix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 8,015 stars compared to 1,170 stars on GitHub. This 6.9x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 383 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Swetrix is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+6.2%) against adding 6 stars for Fathom Lite (+0.1%). Swetrix is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Swetrix shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Swetrix is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Swetrix which began 5 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Swetrix's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Swetrix provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs