What is the main difference between Tianji and Umami?

Tianji and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Tianji or Umami?

The choice between Tianji and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Tianji to Umami?

Migration between Tianji and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Tianji vs Umami

Learn how Tianji and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Tianji

Self-hostable platform combining website analytics, uptime monitoring, server status, Docker tracking, status pages, and telemetry for indie developers and small teams.

Visit Tianji Read more

3,119stars+15(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.34.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
msgbyte/tianji

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

39,982stars+711(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
23 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.4.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
umami-software/umami

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces Tianji in community adoption with 39,982 stars compared to 3,119 stars on GitHub. This 12.8x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 8,499 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Umami wins

Growth Momentum

Umami is growing faster, adding 711 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 15 stars for Tianji (+0.5%). Umami is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Tianji last updated 21 hours ago and Umami 23 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tianji uses Bash, Golang.

Umami wins

Project Maturity

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami wins

Licensing

Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tianji's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji also focuses on Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.

Comparable