Learn how OneUptime and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OneUptime appears to have several advantages over Tianji, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OneUptime leads in popularity with 7,701 stars vs 3,102 stars for Tianji. The 148% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OneUptime has 470 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OneUptime is growing faster, adding 141 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 18 stars for Tianji (+0.6%). OneUptime is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 12 hours ago and Tianji 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses Python, C# while Tianji leverages Next.js.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Tianji extends into Web Analytics.
Both OneUptime and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs