Learn how OneUptime and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OneUptime appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OneUptime significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 7,519 stars compared to 17 stars on GitHub. This 442.3x difference suggests OneUptime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OneUptime has 445 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 12 hours ago and Uptimepage 3 days ago.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 4 months ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptimepage uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both OneUptime and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs