Learn how Checkmate and OneUptime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Checkmate and OneUptime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Checkmate having 9,715 stars and OneUptime having 6,914 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmate has 1,094 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 4 hours ago and OneUptime 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime leverages Typescript, Python, Golang, C#.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 2 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmate is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OneUptime uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring while OneUptime extends into Status Pages.
Both Checkmate and OneUptime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.