What is the main difference between Checkmate and Uptime Kuma?

Checkmate and Uptime Kuma are both infrastructure monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Checkmate or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between Checkmate and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Checkmate to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between Checkmate and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Checkmate vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how Checkmate and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Checkmate

Monitor servers, websites, Docker containers, and infrastructure with real-time insights, instant alerts, and powerful analytics. Self-hosted solution.

Visit Checkmate Read more

10,561stars+268(+2.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v3.10.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
bluewave-labs/checkmate

Sponsor Checkmate onbuymeacoffee.com

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

90,353stars+1,043(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
23 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Sponsor Uptime Kuma ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over Checkmate, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Checkmate in community adoption with 90,353 stars compared to 10,561 stars on GitHub. This 8.6x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,267 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Checkmate wins

Growth Momentum

Checkmate is growing faster, adding 268 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 1,043 stars for Uptime Kuma (+1.2%). Checkmate is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 7 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 23 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmate uses CSS, JSX while Uptime Kuma leverages Typescript, Python, SCSS, Golang, Vue, PHP, Java, C#.

Uptime Kuma wins

Project Maturity

Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 2 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Checkmate's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Uptime Kuma extends into Status Pages.

Comparable