What is the main difference between OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma?

OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenStatus or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenStatus to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

OpenStatus vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how OpenStatus and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

OpenStatus

Open-source status page and uptime monitor that tracks endpoints from 28 global regions, communicates incidents, and helps satisfy SOC 2 audit requirements.

Visit OpenStatus Read more

9,250stars+72(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
openstatus

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

93,364stars+1,098(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over OpenStatus, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces OpenStatus in community adoption with 93,364 stars compared to 9,250 stars on GitHub. This 10.1x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,677 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Uptime Kuma wins

Growth Momentum

Uptime Kuma is growing faster, adding 1,098 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 72 stars for OpenStatus (+0.8%). Uptime Kuma is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStatus last updated 19 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 13 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenStatus uses CSS, JSX, Next.js while Uptime Kuma leverages Python, SCSS, PHP, Java, Vue, C#.

Uptime Kuma wins

Project Maturity

Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenStatus's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable