Ad
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn More
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn how Kener and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Both Kener and OpenStatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStatus leads in popularity with 8,919 stars vs 5,078 stars for Kener. The 76% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 723 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kener last updated 12 days ago and OpenStatus 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kener uses SvelteKit while OpenStatus leverages JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kener beginning 3 years ago and OpenStatus 3 years ago.
Kener uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenStatus's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.
Both Kener and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Kenervs
CheckmateActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository
