Learn how Checkmate and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openstatus
Both Checkmate and OpenStatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Checkmate having 11,033 stars and OpenStatus having 9,250 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmate has 1,239 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmate and OpenStatus are moving at much the same rate, adding 112 stars and adding 72 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 10 hours ago and OpenStatus 19 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenStatus leverages Typescript, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Checkmate beginning 3 years ago and OpenStatus 3 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while OpenStatus extends into Status Pages.
Both Checkmate and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs