Learn how Checkmate and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Checkmate and OpenStatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Checkmate having 10,561 stars and OpenStatus having 8,994 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmate has 1,173 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmate is growing faster, adding 268 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 112 stars for OpenStatus (+1.3%). Checkmate is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 7 hours ago and OpenStatus 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenStatus leverages Typescript, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Checkmate beginning 2 years ago and OpenStatus 3 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while OpenStatus extends into Status Pages.
Both Checkmate and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs