Learn how Checkmate and Healthchecks differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Checkmate and Healthchecks have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Checkmate and Healthchecks show comparable community engagement with 10,561 and 10,262 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmate has 1,173 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmate is growing faster, adding 268 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 26 stars for Healthchecks (+0.3%). Checkmate is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 8 hours ago and Healthchecks 13 hours ago.
Healthchecks has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 2 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Healthchecks may have more mature features and established processes.
Healthchecks uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Checkmate's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while Healthchecks extends into Job Scheduling.
Both Checkmate and Healthchecks offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs