Learn how Cachet and Healthchecks differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Cachet and Healthchecks have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cachet having 15,222 stars and Healthchecks having 10,262 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,631 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cachet is growing faster, adding 79 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 26 stars for Healthchecks (+0.3%). Cachet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 3 days ago and Healthchecks 13 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cachet beginning 12 years ago and Healthchecks 11 years ago.
Healthchecks is licensed under BSD-3-Clause, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cachet also focuses on Status Pages while Healthchecks extends into Job Scheduling.
Both Cachet and Healthchecks offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs