Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Cachet and OneUptime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Both Cachet and OneUptime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet leads in popularity with 15,156 stars vs 7,392 stars for OneUptime. The 105% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,626 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 6 days ago and OneUptime 5 hours ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while OneUptime leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, C#.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to OneUptime which began 5 years ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Cachet and OneUptime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Cachetvs
GatusActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
