What is the main difference between Cachet and OneUptime?

Cachet and OneUptime are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cachet or OneUptime?

The choice between Cachet and OneUptime depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cachet to OneUptime?

Migration between Cachet and OneUptime is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

Cachet vs OneUptime

Learn how Cachet and OneUptime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

Cachet

Open-source status page platform that helps organizations communicate system status and incidents effectively with customizable components and metrics tracking

Visit Cachet Read more

15,262stars+8(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 days ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
v2.4.1
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
cachethq/cachet

OneUptime

All-in-one solution for uptime monitoring, incident management, and status pages to keep your services running smoothly

Visit OneUptime Read more

7,801stars+84(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
14.0.105
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
oneuptime/oneuptime

Detailed Comparison

Both Cachet and OneUptime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cachet wins

Community & Popularity

Cachet leads in popularity with 15,262 stars vs 7,801 stars for OneUptime. The 96% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,630 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OneUptime wins

Growth Momentum

OneUptime is growing faster, adding 84 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 8 stars for Cachet (+0.1%). OneUptime is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 6 days ago and OneUptime 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while OneUptime leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, C#.

Cachet wins

Project Maturity

Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to OneUptime which began 5 years ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.

OneUptime wins

Licensing

OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).

Comparable