Learn how OneUptime and StatusScout differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 5 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

OneUptime appears to have several advantages over StatusScout, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OneUptime significantly outpaces StatusScout in community adoption with 6,914 stars compared to 12 stars on GitHub. This 576.2x difference suggests OneUptime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OneUptime has 374 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OneUptime shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while StatusScout was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests OneUptime is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses Python, Golang, C#.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to StatusScout which began 10 months ago. This 4.1-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0, while StatusScout's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while StatusScout extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both OneUptime and StatusScout offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs