OneUptime significantly outpaces Peekaping in community adoption with 7,392 stars compared to 1,164 stars on GitHub. This 6.4x difference suggests OneUptime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OneUptime has 422 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

OneUptime shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while Peekaping was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OneUptime is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses Python, C#.

OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Peekaping which began 1 year ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.

Peekaping uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OneUptime's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Peekaping extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Both OneUptime and Peekaping offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.