Learn how Gatus and Peekaping differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v5.38.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
twin/gatus
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
0.1.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
0xfurai/peekaping
Gatus appears to have several advantages over Peekaping, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gatus significantly outpaces Peekaping in community adoption with 12,655 stars compared to 1,216 stars on GitHub. This 10.4x difference suggests Gatus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gatus has 895 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Gatus is growing faster, adding 377 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 13 stars for Peekaping (+1.1%). Gatus is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Gatus last updated 6 hours ago and Peekaping 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Gatus uses Vue while Peekaping leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Peekaping which began 1 year ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
Peekaping uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Gatus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Gatus and Peekaping offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs