Learn how Checkmate and Gatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Checkmate and Gatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Checkmate having 10,568 stars and Gatus having 11,863 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmate has 1,174 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmate and Gatus are moving at much the same rate, adding 245 stars and adding 297 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.4% vs +2.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmate last updated 20 hours ago and Gatus 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmate uses Bash, JSX while Gatus leverages Golang, Vue.
Gatus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Gatus may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmate is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Gatus uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Checkmate also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Gatus extends into Status Pages.
Both Checkmate and Gatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.