Learn how Cachet and Checkmate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
cachethq/cachet
Last 30 days

Both Cachet and Checkmate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cachet having 15,262 stars and Checkmate having 11,033 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,630 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmate is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 8 stars for Cachet (+0.1%). Checkmate is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 6 days ago and Checkmate 10 hours ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while Checkmate leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 3 years ago. This 9.6-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
Checkmate is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cachet also focuses on Status Pages while Checkmate extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Cachet and Checkmate offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs