Learn how Cachet and Checkmate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Cachet and Checkmate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet leads in popularity with 15,023 stars vs 9,715 stars for Checkmate. The 55% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,613 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 2 days ago and Checkmate 4 hours ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while Checkmate leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Checkmate which began 2 years ago. This 9.6-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
Checkmate is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cachet also focuses on Status Pages while Checkmate extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Cachet and Checkmate offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.