Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Cachet in community adoption with 89,634 stars compared to 15,156 stars on GitHub. This 5.9x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,185 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 6 days ago and Uptime Kuma 22 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cachet uses Laravel while Uptime Kuma leverages JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, Golang, Vue, Java, C#.

Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Uptime Kuma which began 5 years ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Both Cachet and Uptime Kuma offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.