What is the main difference between EasyMonitor and Uptime Kuma?

EasyMonitor and Uptime Kuma are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: EasyMonitor or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between EasyMonitor and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from EasyMonitor to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between EasyMonitor and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

EasyMonitor vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how EasyMonitor and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

EasyMonitor

Deploy your own uptime and performance monitoring with HTTP/ICMP checks, multi-region probes, and custom status pages. MIT licensed, runs on minimal hardware.

Visit EasyMonitor Read more

75stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.3.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
easymonitordev/easymonitor

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

91,921stars+1,146(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.5
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Sponsor Uptime Kuma ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over EasyMonitor, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces EasyMonitor in community adoption with 91,921 stars compared to 75 stars on GitHub. This 1225.6x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,473 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Uptime Kuma wins

Development Activity

Uptime Kuma shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while EasyMonitor was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Uptime Kuma is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: EasyMonitor uses CSS, Laravel while Uptime Kuma leverages Typescript, Python, SCSS, Vue, Java, C#.

Uptime Kuma wins

Project Maturity

Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to EasyMonitor which began 1 year ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable