What is the main difference between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma?

OneUptime and Uptime Kuma are both status pages but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OneUptime or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OneUptime to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Databuddy – AI-Native Web & Product Analytics you can trust, turn manual dashboards into automated insights.

Start Tracking Free

Learn more

OneUptime vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how OneUptime and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.

OneUptime

All-in-one solution for uptime monitoring, incident management, and status pages to keep your services running smoothly

Visit OneUptime Read more

Stars
6,913
Forks
374
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 11 hours ago.

Uptime Kuma

A user-friendly, open-source uptime monitoring solution for tracking website and service availability

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

Stars
86,102
Forks
7,754
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
5 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 11 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over OneUptime, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces OneUptime in community adoption with 86,102 stars compared to 6,913 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 7,754 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 12 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, C#. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses CSS, JSX while Uptime Kuma leverages SCSS, PHP, Vue, Java.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with OneUptime beginning 5 years ago and Uptime Kuma 5 years ago.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OneUptime's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable