What is the main difference between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma?

OneUptime and Uptime Kuma are both uptime monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OneUptime or Uptime Kuma?

The choice between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OneUptime to Uptime Kuma?

Migration between OneUptime and Uptime Kuma is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

OneUptime vs Uptime Kuma

Learn how OneUptime and Uptime Kuma differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.

OneUptime

All-in-one solution for uptime monitoring, incident management, and status pages to keep your services running smoothly

Visit OneUptime Read more

7,801stars+84(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
14.0.105
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
oneuptime/oneuptime

Uptime Kuma

Monitors websites, APIs, and services with real-time alerts, a status page, and support for dozens of notification channels. Self-hosted and Docker-friendly.

Visit Uptime Kuma Read more

93,364stars+1,098(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
2.5.9
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
louislam/uptime-kuma

Detailed Comparison

Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over OneUptime, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptime Kuma wins

Community & Popularity

Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces OneUptime in community adoption with 93,364 stars compared to 7,801 stars on GitHub. This 12.0x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 8,677 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

OneUptime and Uptime Kuma are moving at much the same rate, adding 84 stars and adding 1,098 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 8 hours ago and Uptime Kuma 13 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, C#. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses CSS, JSX while Uptime Kuma leverages SCSS, PHP, Java, Vue.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with OneUptime beginning 5 years ago and Uptime Kuma 5 years ago.

Uptime Kuma wins

Licensing

Uptime Kuma uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OneUptime's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM) while Uptime Kuma extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable