Learn how OneUptime and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both OneUptime and OpenStatus have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OneUptime having 7,040 stars and OpenStatus having 8,692 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 656 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 19 hours ago and OpenStatus 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses Python, C# while OpenStatus leverages Next.js.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OpenStatus uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both OneUptime and OpenStatus offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs