Learn how OneUptime and OpenStatus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these status pages is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

OneUptime appears to have several advantages over OpenStatus, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OneUptime having 6,913 stars and OpenStatus having 8,630 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStatus has 649 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OneUptime last updated 13 hours ago and OpenStatus 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OneUptime uses Python, C# while OpenStatus leverages Next.js.
OneUptime has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to OpenStatus which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests OneUptime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OneUptime is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OpenStatus uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: OneUptime also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM).
OneUptime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenStatus may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs