Learn how Tianji and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Tianji appears to have several advantages over Uptimepage, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 3,097 stars compared to 34 stars on GitHub. This 91.1x difference suggests Tianji has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 194 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Tianji last updated 2 days ago and Uptimepage 5 days ago.
Tianji has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 4 months ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Tianji may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Tianji is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptimepage uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji also focuses on Web Analytics.
Both Tianji and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs