Learn how EasyMonitor and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both EasyMonitor and Tianji have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tianji significantly outpaces EasyMonitor in community adoption with 3,085 stars compared to 74 stars on GitHub. This 41.7x difference suggests Tianji has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tianji has 196 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with EasyMonitor last updated 5 days ago and Tianji 5 days ago.
Tianji has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to EasyMonitor which began 11 months ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Tianji may have more mature features and established processes.
EasyMonitor uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tianji's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tianji extends into Web Analytics.
Both EasyMonitor and Tianji offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs