What is the main difference between Countly and Tianji?

Countly and Tianji are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Countly or Tianji?

The choice between Countly and Tianji depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Countly to Tianji?

Migration between Countly and Tianji is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Countly vs Tianji

Learn how Countly and Tianji differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Countly

All-in-one analytics platform for mobile, web, and desktop apps. Track user behavior, monitor performance, and optimize your product.

Visit Countly Read more

5,926stars+13(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
25.03.58
License
Other
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
countly-server

Tianji

Self-hostable platform combining website analytics, uptime monitoring, server status, Docker tracking, status pages, and telemetry for indie developers and small teams.

Visit Tianji Read more

3,119stars+15(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.34.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
msgbyte/tianji

Detailed Comparison

Both Countly and Tianji have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Countly wins

Community & Popularity

Countly leads in popularity with 5,926 stars vs 3,119 stars for Tianji. The 90% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 985 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Tianji wins

Growth Momentum

Tianji is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 13 stars for Countly (+0.2%). Tianji is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 2 days ago and Tianji 21 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tianji leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js, Golang.

Countly wins

Project Maturity

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Tianji which began 3 years ago. This 11.4-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under Other while Tianji uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics while Tianji extends into Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.

Comparable