Learn how Countly and Vemetric differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Countly appears to have several advantages over Vemetric, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly significantly outpaces Vemetric in community adoption with 5,850 stars compared to 345 stars on GitHub. This 17.0x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 1 day ago and Vemetric 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash while Vemetric leverages JSX.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Vemetric which began 11 months ago. This 13.2-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Vemetric is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Countly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Vemetric may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs