Learn how Cachet and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Cachet and Uptimepage have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 15,230 stars compared to 17 stars on GitHub. This 895.9x difference suggests Cachet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,632 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 3 days ago and Uptimepage 3 days ago.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 4 months ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptimepage is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Cachet and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs