Learn how Cachet and Uptimepage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these uptime monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
cachethq/cachet
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
6 monthsVersion
v1.6.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
uptimepage
Both Cachet and Uptimepage have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cachet significantly outpaces Uptimepage in community adoption with 15,264 stars compared to 58 stars on GitHub. This 263.2x difference suggests Cachet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cachet has 1,629 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cachet last updated 2 days ago and Uptimepage 14 hours ago.
Cachet uses PHP, Laravel while Uptimepage leverages JavaScript, Bash, Python, Rust.
Cachet has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Uptimepage which began 6 months ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Cachet may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptimepage is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cachet's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Uptime Monitoring, Status Pages.
Both Cachet and Uptimepage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs