Learn how Joplin and Memos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Joplin and Memos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Joplin and Memos show comparable community engagement with 54,454 and 59,088 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,064 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 11 hours ago and Memos 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, C++, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while Memos leverages Golang.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Memos which began 4 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Joplin and Memos offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs