Learn how Joplin and Memos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Joplin and Memos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Joplin having 56,065 stars and Memos having 62,463 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,245 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Memos is growing faster, adding 695 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 351 stars for Joplin (+0.6%). Memos is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 9 hours ago and Memos 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Memos leverages Golang.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Memos which began 5 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Joplin and Memos offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs