Learn how Joplin and Memos differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.7.21Self-hosted
YesRepository
laurent22/joplin
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.31.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
usememos/memos
Both Joplin and Memos have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Joplin having 56,850 stars and Memos having 64,025 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,363 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Memos is growing faster, adding 740 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 373 stars for Joplin (+0.7%). Memos is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 10 hours ago and Memos 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Memos leverages Golang.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Memos which began 5 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Joplin and Memos offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs