Learn how Memos and Standard Notes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Memos and Standard Notes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memos significantly outpaces Standard Notes in community adoption with 59,088 stars compared to 6,419 stars on GitHub. This 9.2x difference suggests Memos has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,292 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Memos last updated 9 hours ago and Standard Notes 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Memos uses Golang while Standard Notes leverages SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Standard Notes has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Memos which began 4 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Standard Notes may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Standard Notes's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes. However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Memos and Standard Notes offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs