Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Joplin and Standard Notes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Both Joplin and Standard Notes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces Standard Notes in community adoption with 55,779 stars compared to 6,574 stars on GitHub. This 8.5x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,201 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 8 hours ago and Standard Notes 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Python, Rust, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Joplin beginning 10 years ago and Standard Notes 10 years ago.
Standard Notes is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes. However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both Joplin and Standard Notes offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Joplinvs
SiYuanActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
