Beaver Notes vs Joplin

Joplin significantly outpaces Beaver Notes in community adoption with 56,065 stars compared to 1,330 stars on GitHub. This 42.2x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,245 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Beaver Notes is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 351 stars for Joplin (+0.6%). Beaver Notes is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Beaver Notes last updated 10 hours ago and Joplin 9 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Beaver Notes uses Vue while Joplin leverages Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Beaver Notes which began 3 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Beaver Notes is licensed under MIT, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Beaver Notes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.