Joplin significantly outpaces Blinko in community adoption with 55,821 stars compared to 10,831 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Blinko last updated 11 hours ago and Joplin 12 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Blinko uses Tauri while Joplin leverages Python, SCSS, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, MATLAB.

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Blinko which began 2 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Blinko is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Joplin extends into Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Both Blinko and Joplin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.