Learn how Joplin and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.7.22Self-hosted
YesRepository
laurent22/joplin
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
3 yearsRepository
tonghoai/opennotas
Joplin appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 57,074 stars compared to 179 stars on GitHub. This 318.8x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,405 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Joplin is growing faster, adding 428 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 0 stars for OpenNotas (0%). Joplin is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Joplin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while OpenNotas was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Joplin is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 3 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs