Joplin vs OpenNotas

Joplin significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 56,525 stars compared to 179 stars on GitHub. This 315.8x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,313 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Joplin and OpenNotas are moving at much the same rate, adding 357 stars and adding 1 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Joplin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while OpenNotas was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Joplin is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, C++, Kotlin, MATLAB while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 2 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.