Learn how Joplin and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Joplin appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 56,009 stars compared to 178 stars on GitHub. This 314.7x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,237 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenNotas is growing faster, adding 4 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 353 stars for Joplin (+0.6%). OpenNotas is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Joplin last updated 9 hours ago and OpenNotas 14 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, C, Rust, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 2 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs