Learn how Joplin and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .


Joplin appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Joplin significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 54,752 stars compared to 172 stars on GitHub. This 318.3x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,090 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Joplin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while OpenNotas was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Joplin is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, C++, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 2 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs