What is the main difference between Joplin and OpenNotas?

Joplin and OpenNotas are both note-taking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Joplin or OpenNotas?

The choice between Joplin and OpenNotas depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Joplin to OpenNotas?

Migration between Joplin and OpenNotas is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Visit Docmost

Learn more

Joplin vs OpenNotas

Learn how Joplin and OpenNotas differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.

Joplin

Cross-platform note-taking app with end-to-end encryption, Markdown support, web clipping, and sync via Dropbox, OneDrive, or Joplin Cloud.

Visit Joplin Read more

Stars
55,282
Forks
6,151
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
9 years
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

98/100

View Repository

OpenNotas

OpenNotas is a multi-platform, end-to-end encrypted note-taking app that offers simplicity, synchronization, and offline functionality.

Visit OpenNotas Read more

Stars
171
Forks
19
Last commit
3 months ago
Repository age
2 years

Activity score

62/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Joplin appears to have several advantages over OpenNotas, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Joplin wins

Community & Popularity

Joplin significantly outpaces OpenNotas in community adoption with 55,282 stars compared to 171 stars on GitHub. This 323.3x difference suggests Joplin has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,151 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Joplin wins

Development Activity

Joplin shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while OpenNotas was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Joplin is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Joplin uses Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while OpenNotas leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.

Joplin wins

Project Maturity

Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to OpenNotas which began 2 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Secure & Encrypted Notes.

Joplin wins

Hosting & Deployment

Joplin provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenNotas may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.