Learn how AppFlowy and Joplin differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these personal knowledge management (pkm) tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both AppFlowy and Joplin have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with AppFlowy having 69,914 stars and Joplin having 54,454 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Joplin has 6,064 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppFlowy last updated 15 days ago and Joplin 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, C++, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppFlowy uses Dart while Joplin leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, SCSS, Ruby.
Joplin has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to AppFlowy which began 5 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Joplin may have more mature features and established processes.
AppFlowy is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Joplin's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: AppFlowy also focuses on Task Management, Collaborative Notes & Wikis while Joplin extends into Note-Taking, Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both AppFlowy and Joplin offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs