Learn how AppFlowy and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both AppFlowy and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppFlowy significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 69,970 stars compared to 1,238 stars on GitHub. This 56.5x difference suggests AppFlowy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, AppFlowy has 5,153 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppFlowy last updated 17 days ago and XWiki 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppFlowy uses Rust, C, Objective-C, C++, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart while XWiki leverages CSS, Typescript, Python, Vue.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to AppFlowy which began 5 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: AppFlowy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while XWiki uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: AppFlowy also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Task Management while XWiki extends into Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
AppFlowy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while XWiki may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.