Learn how Docmost and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Docmost and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Docmost significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 21,628 stars compared to 1,307 stars on GitHub. This 16.5x difference suggests Docmost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docmost has 1,553 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Docmost is growing faster, adding 305 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 13 stars for XWiki (+1%). Docmost is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Docmost last updated 13 hours ago and XWiki 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Docmost uses JSX, NestJS while XWiki leverages Bash, Python, Vue, Java.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Docmost which began 3 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Docmost is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while XWiki uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis, Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Both Docmost and XWiki offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.