Learn how Docmost and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Docmost and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Docmost significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 20,002 stars compared to 1,244 stars on GitHub. This 16.1x difference suggests Docmost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docmost has 1,265 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Docmost last updated 1 day ago and XWiki 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Docmost uses JSX, NestJS while XWiki leverages Bash, Python, Vue, Java.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Docmost which began 3 years ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Docmost is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while XWiki uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis, Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Docmost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while XWiki may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.