Learn how Docmost and Macro Docs differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.

Docmost appears to have several advantages over Macro Docs, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Docmost significantly outpaces Macro Docs in community adoption with 21,117 stars compared to 597 stars on GitHub. This 35.4x difference suggests Docmost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docmost has 1,460 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Docmost last updated 1 day ago and Macro Docs 3 hours ago.
Docmost has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro Docs which began 9 months ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Docmost may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: Docmost also focuses on Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Docmost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Docs may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Repository