Docmost vs Macro Docs

Docmost significantly outpaces Macro Docs in community adoption with 22,202 stars compared to 6,083 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Docmost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docmost has 1,661 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro Docs is growing faster, adding 1,543 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 341 stars for Docmost (+1.6%). Macro Docs is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Docmost last updated 14 hours ago and Macro Docs 9 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Docmost uses NestJS while Macro Docs leverages Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Docmost has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro Docs which began 1 year ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Docmost may have more mature features and established processes.

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: Docmost also focuses on Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.

Docmost provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Docs may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.