Macro Docs vs XWiki

Macro Docs significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 6,083 stars compared to 1,329 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Macro Docs has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, XWiki has 674 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Macro Docs is growing faster, adding 1,543 stars in the last 30 days (+34%) against adding 15 stars for XWiki (+1.1%). Macro Docs is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Docs last updated 9 hours ago and XWiki 11 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Docs uses JSX, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri while XWiki leverages Vue, Java.

XWiki has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Macro Docs which began 1 year ago. This 14.9-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Macro Docs is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while XWiki uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: XWiki extends into Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.

XWiki provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Docs may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.