Learn how Outline and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Outline and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Outline significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 40,678 stars compared to 1,313 stars on GitHub. This 31.0x difference suggests Outline has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Outline has 3,581 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Outline and XWiki are moving at much the same rate, adding 367 stars and adding 10 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Outline last updated 9 hours ago and XWiki 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Outline uses JSX while XWiki leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Vue, Java.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Outline which began 10 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Outline is licensed under BUSL-1.1 while XWiki uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis, Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Both Outline and XWiki offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.