Learn how Outline and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Outline and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Outline significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 38,254 stars compared to 1,238 stars on GitHub. This 30.9x difference suggests Outline has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Outline has 3,231 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Outline last updated 13 hours ago and XWiki 22 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Outline uses JSX while XWiki leverages CSS, Bash, Python, Vue, Java.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Outline which began 10 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
XWiki is licensed under LGPL-2.1, while Outline's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis, Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Outline provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while XWiki may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.