Affine significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 71,533 stars compared to 1,295 stars on GitHub. This 55.2x difference suggests Affine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Affine has 5,146 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Affine is growing faster, adding 1,066 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 15 stars for XWiki (+1.2%). Affine is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Affine last updated 7 hours ago and XWiki 3 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Affine uses JSX, C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin while XWiki leverages Python, Vue.

XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Affine which began 4 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.

Affine uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than XWiki's LGPL-2.1 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: Affine also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding while XWiki extends into Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.

Affine provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while XWiki may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.