Learn how Affine and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Affine and XWiki have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Affine significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 67,621 stars compared to 1,238 stars on GitHub. This 54.6x difference suggests Affine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Affine has 4,776 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Affine last updated 15 hours ago and XWiki 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Affine uses JSX, Rust, C, Objective-C, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin while XWiki leverages Python, Vue.
XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Affine which began 4 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.
XWiki is licensed under LGPL-2.1, while Affine's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: Affine also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding while XWiki extends into Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.
Affine provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while XWiki may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.