What is the main difference between Affine and XWiki?

Affine and XWiki are both collaborative notes & wikis but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Affine or XWiki?

The choice between Affine and XWiki depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Affine to XWiki?

Migration between Affine and XWiki is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Affine vs XWiki

Learn how Affine and XWiki differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative notes & wikis is best for you.

Affine

An open-source, local-first knowledge base that merges structured docs, infinite whiteboards, databases, and AI into a single workspace for teams and creators.

Visit Affine Read more

72,158stars+972(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v0.27.4
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
toeverything/affine

Sponsor Affine ongithub.com

XWiki

XWiki is a flexible, feature-rich wiki software that helps organizations structure and share knowledge efficiently.

Visit XWiki Read more

1,302stars+9(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
18.7.0
License
LGPL-2.1
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
xwiki/xwiki-platform

Sponsor XWiki onopencollective.com

Detailed Comparison

Affine appears to have several advantages over XWiki, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Affine wins

Community & Popularity

Affine significantly outpaces XWiki in community adoption with 72,158 stars compared to 1,302 stars on GitHub. This 55.4x difference suggests Affine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Affine has 5,222 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Affine wins

Growth Momentum

Affine is growing faster, adding 972 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 9 stars for XWiki (+0.7%). Affine is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Affine last updated 7 hours ago and XWiki 2 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Affine uses JSX, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin while XWiki leverages Python, Vue.

XWiki wins

Project Maturity

XWiki has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Affine which began 4 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests XWiki may have more mature features and established processes.

Affine wins

Licensing

Affine uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than XWiki's LGPL-2.1 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Notes & Wikis. However, they also have distinct specializations: Affine also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding while XWiki extends into Wiki Software, Internal Knowledge Bases.

Comparable