Learn how Affine and Tldraw differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both Affine and Tldraw have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Affine having 73,473 stars and Tldraw having 50,896 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Affine has 5,357 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Affine and Tldraw are moving at much the same rate, adding 957 stars and adding 562 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Affine last updated 2 days ago and Tldraw 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Affine uses Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin while Tldraw leverages Next.js, Vue, GLSL.
Tldraw has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Affine which began 4 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Tldraw may have more mature features and established processes.
Affine is licensed under MIT, while Tldraw's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding. However, they also have distinct specializations: Affine also focuses on Collaborative Notes & Wikis while Tldraw extends into Online Design.
Affine provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tldraw may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.