Learn how Excalidraw and Tldraw differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v0.18.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
excalidraw
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v5.6.0Repository
tldraw/tldraw
Excalidraw appears to have several advantages over Tldraw, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Excalidraw leads in popularity with 135,318 stars vs 51,413 stars for Tldraw. The 163% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Excalidraw has 16,050 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Excalidraw and Tldraw are moving at much the same rate, adding 1,761 stars and adding 590 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Excalidraw last updated 1 day ago and Tldraw 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Excalidraw uses SCSS while Tldraw leverages Bash, Vue, GLSL.
Excalidraw has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Tldraw which began 6 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Excalidraw may have more mature features and established processes.
Excalidraw is licensed under MIT, while Tldraw's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding, Online Design.
Excalidraw provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tldraw may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.