Learn how Excalidraw and Tldraw differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Excalidraw appears to have several advantages over Tldraw, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Excalidraw leads in popularity with 130,027 stars vs 49,863 stars for Tldraw. The 161% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Excalidraw has 14,919 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Excalidraw and Tldraw are moving at much the same rate, adding 2,087 stars and adding 800 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.6% vs +1.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Excalidraw last updated 3 days ago and Tldraw 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Excalidraw uses SCSS while Tldraw leverages Bash, Vue, GLSL.
Excalidraw has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Tldraw which began 5 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Excalidraw may have more mature features and established processes.
Excalidraw is licensed under MIT, while Tldraw's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces, Online Design, Whiteboarding.
Excalidraw provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tldraw may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.