Learn how AppFlowy and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these personal knowledge management (pkm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
0.15.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
appflowy-io/appflowy
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.8.10License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
siyuan-note/siyuan
AppFlowy appears to have several advantages over SiYuan, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppFlowy leads in popularity with 78,827 stars vs 47,211 stars for SiYuan. The 67% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, AppFlowy has 6,263 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
AppFlowy is growing faster, adding 1,501 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 438 stars for SiYuan (+0.9%). AppFlowy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppFlowy last updated 11 days ago and SiYuan 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppFlowy uses Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C++, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart while SiYuan leverages CSS, Typescript, Python, Golang, SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with AppFlowy beginning 5 years ago and SiYuan 6 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: AppFlowy also focuses on Task Management, Collaborative Notes & Wikis while SiYuan extends into Note-Taking.
Both AppFlowy and SiYuan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs