Learn how Memos and SiYuan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Memos and SiYuan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Memos having 59,088 stars and SiYuan having 42,891 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Memos has 4,292 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Memos last updated 11 hours ago and SiYuan 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Memos uses JSX while SiYuan leverages Python, SCSS.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Memos which began 4 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Memos uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SiYuan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking, Personal Knowledge Management (PKM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Memos also focuses on Secure & Encrypted Notes.
Both Memos and SiYuan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs