Learn how SiYuan and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 45,890 stars compared to 1,163 stars on GitHub. This 39.5x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,954 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zen is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 601 stars for SiYuan (+1.3%). Zen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with SiYuan last updated 7 hours ago and Zen 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SiYuan uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS while Zen leverages JSX.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Zen which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SiYuan also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Zen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs