Learn how SiYuan and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 42,817 stars compared to 1,079 stars on GitHub. This 39.7x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,708 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with SiYuan last updated 6 hours ago and Zen 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SiYuan uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS while Zen leverages JSX.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Zen which began 1 year ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SiYuan also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Zen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs