Learn how SiYuan and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 46,234 stars compared to 1,171 stars on GitHub. This 39.5x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,988 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SiYuan and Zen are moving at much the same rate, adding 547 stars and adding 13 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.2% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with SiYuan last updated 13 hours ago and Zen 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SiYuan uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS while Zen leverages JSX.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Zen which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SiYuan also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
Both SiYuan and Zen offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs