Learn how SiYuan and Zen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these note-taking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

SiYuan appears to have several advantages over Zen, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SiYuan significantly outpaces Zen in community adoption with 44,214 stars compared to 1,089 stars on GitHub. This 40.6x difference suggests SiYuan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SiYuan has 2,818 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SiYuan shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while Zen was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests SiYuan is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SiYuan uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS while Zen leverages JSX.
SiYuan has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Zen which began 1 year ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests SiYuan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Note-Taking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SiYuan also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM).
SiYuan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Zen may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs